Requirements for publication

  • Печать
Подробности
Категория: Uncategorised
Опубликовано 12.11.2015 19:10
Автор: Super User
Просмотров: 20752

REQUIREMENTS FOR ARTICLE EXECUTION

1. The journal is published only in English. The editorial office accepts high-quality articles written in English or Ukrainian. Ukrainian articles are subject to English translation by a professional translator. 

2. The length of the article is 10–20 pages. Font: Times New Roman; size 14, line spacing – 1,5.

3. It is important to specify UDC before the title of the article.

4. You should provide information about the author(s) written in Ukrainian and English, specifying the following facts for every co-author: 

  • surname and name in full;
  • a scientific degree, academic rank (if any), post, place of employment and its full address (a street, house number, city, region, country, zip/postal code);
  • e-mail;
  • ORCID (http://orcid.org/), Scopus-Author ID (if any Scopus publications).

5. An article’s title, abstract and key words should be submitted in English and Ukrainian. Each abstract is at least 1800 characters without spacings. 

According to the requirements of scientometric databases, the abstract shall consist of the purpose of the research, methodology, scientific novelty, conclusions. 

The total number of key words is no less than three and no more than seven. 

6. Requirements for the main part of the article: 

  • Introduction is an obligatory part involving scientific novelty and relevance of scientific decisions. The purpose of the research should be clear along with scientific-research tasks. An author should convey the research methodology and the logic of the material’s presentation;
  • The main text should have separate sections with individual titles and elucidate the essence of each section. Avoid too long titles;
  • An article shall have Conclusions demonstrating substantiated research findings and prospects for further studies. 

7. References in the text are submitted in round brackets: an author’s surname – comma – publication year – comma – pages which contain information the author refer to (Bibikov, 2010, pp. 25–34). References to several pages are presented simultaneously by a semicolon (Bibikov, 2010; Pietrov, 2007; Ivanov, 2015), the indication of pages is optional.

8. The list of used sources is mentioned at the end of the article in English and in accordance with the international standard bibliographic description APA (American Psychological Association). The titles of Ukrainian and Russian sources are transliterated, and their translation are rendered in square brackets. 

Bibliography should consist of some latest sources (for the last 3 years) and a minimum of one scientific article published in the journal indexed in Scopus (for instance, scientific articles published in such Ukrainian law journals as Journal of the "National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine", "Lex Portus" etc.).

There should be at least one reference in the text to each source from a Bibliography list.

The used sources are submitted in alphabetical order and are not numbered. If a source has DOI, it is necessary to mention it.

9. The submission date of the article is written at the end of the article (The article was submitted on 15.04.2021).

 

PROHIBITION TO REFER TO THE AGGRESSOR STATE’S SCHOLARLY PAPERS:

It is prohibited citing and including in the reference list russian-language contributions published in any country, incl. papers written in other languages but published in russia and belarus.

SAMPLE OF ARTICLE EXECUTION

UDC 347.454

 

Tetiana Kolomoets, Doctor of Law, Professor, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Honored Lawyer of Ukraine, Dean of the Faculty of Law, Zaporizhzhya National University, 74, Soborniy avenue, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine, postal code 69063,  Этот адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.
ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1101-8073

 

“Proportionality test” in the legal regulation of restriction after the termination of public service career: search for an optimal model

 

Abstract. Purpose. The substantiation of the expediency to set restriction after the termination of the public service career, which is based on “the proportionality test”, distinguishing the unified standards for the consolidation of its elements. Research methods. The paper is executed by applying the general research and special methods of scientific cognition. Results. The article analyses the basic doctrinal approaches for the understanding of “proportionality test”, its “narrow” and “broad” versions, justifies its “basic” role for the shaping of a model of legal regulation of the restriction as an instrument for corruption prevention in the legal area. Conclusions. In the context of active use of a unique resource of the restriction after the termination of public service career as an instrument for corruption prevention in the private sector, “the proportionality test” in its broad sense, as the mix of several obligatory complex elements, should be the basis for shaping model of its legal regulation which is perfect in content and effective in use. (Обсяг: 1800 знаків без пробілів).

Key words: private sector corruption, “filter”, expediency, need, balance between public and private interests, legislation, standards, elements.

 

1. Introduction

In the context of searching for effective instruments for corruption prevention in the private sector, the interested community should focus on the unique kind of “anti-corruption” restriction – the restriction after the termination of public service career. 

2. “Proportionality test”: fundamental professional doctrinal approaches to the comprehension

The first is associated exclusively with a balance between (sometimes, it is used the words combinations “fair balance”, “smart balance” (Great encyclopedia, 2017) public and private interests, thus its identification with “commensuration”, “dimensionality”, “proportionality” (Yevtoshuk, 2015).

3. Restrictions for an individual after the termination of public service career as an area of “proportionality test” objectification

Legal and regulatory framework of the relevant kind of “special” restriction is well-established by the international anti-corruption standard. 

4. Conclusions

In the context of active use of a unique resource of the restriction after the termination of public service career as an instrument for corruption prevention in the private sector, “the proportionality test” in its broad sense, as the mix of several obligatory complex elements, should act as the basis for shaping model of its legal regulation which is perfect in content and effective in use.

 

References:

Holovkin, B.M., Obolentsev, V.F., Romanov, M.V. et al. (2019). Zapobihannia koruptsii: pidruchnyk [Corruption prevention: a textbook]. Kharkiv: Pravo (in Ukrainian).

Totskyi, B.A. (2013). Pryntsyp proportsiinosti: istorychnyi aspekt i teoretychni skladovi [Proportionality test: historical aspect and theoretical components], Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava, 2013, no. 3, pp. 70–74 (in Ukrainian).

Villoriia, M., Synnestrom, S., Bertok, Ya. (2010). Etyka derzhavnoi sluzhby: zapobihannia konfliktu interesiv ta vymohy do zakonodavstva [Civil service ethics: prevention of conflict of interests and requirements for the legislation]. Kyiv: Tsentr adaptatsii derzhavnoi sluzhby do standartiv YeS (in Ukrainian).

 

Тетяна Коломоєць, доктор юридичних наук, професор, член-кореспондент Національної академії правових наук України, Заслужений юрист України, декан юридичного факультету, Запорізький національний університет, проспект Соборний, 74, Запоріжжя, Україна, індекс 69063,  Этот адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.
ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1101-8073

 

«Тест на пропорційність» у правовому регулюванні обмеження після припинення публічної служби: пошук оптимальної моделі

 

Анотація. Мета. Обґрунтування доцільності формування обмеження після припинення публічної служби, підґрунтям якої є «тест на пропорційність», із виокремленням єдиних стандартів закріплення його елементів. Методи дослідження. Робота виконана на підставі загальнонаукових та спеціальних методів наукового пізнання. Результати. Проаналізовано основні доктринальні підходи щодо розуміння «тесту на пропорційність», його «вузького» та «широкого» варіантів, доведено його «базову» роль для формування моделі правового регулювання відповідного обмеження як інструменту запобігання корупції у правовій сфері. Висновки. В умовах активного використання унікального ресурсу обмеження після припинення публічної служби як інструменту запобігання корупції в приватній сфері підґрунтям для формування досконалою за змістом та ефективної у застосуванні моделі його правового регулювання має слугувати «тест на пропорційність» у його широкому розумінні як поєднання декількох обов’язкових комплексних елементів.
Ключові слова: корупція у приватній сфері, «фільтр», доречність, необхідність, баланс публічних та приватних інтересів, законодавство, стандарти, елементи.

 

The article was submitted 15.07.2021